Doctor`s Groundbreaking Discovery: Chemotherapy Kills Cancer Patients Faster Than No Treatment at All
In the early 1900`s, only 1 in 100 people had the risk of getting cancer, in the 1950s it increased to 1 out of 50 persons. Nowadays even 1 in 3 persons has the chance of getting cancer, and in the future the chances are about to increase up to 1 in 2 people.
What would you do in case you get cancer?
You have two options: chemotherapy, which is declined by 75% of doctors, which is effective in 2-3% of the cases, and which has been proved to stimulate the growth of cancer, or you can use organic and natural ingredients which have been shown to be highly effective Cancer Cures without any negative effect.
Although most of the people are aware of the side effects of the chemotherapy, they still continue receiving this treatment because doctors have profit of prescribing these toxic drugs to each patient.
Read this article and put an end to the chemotherapy and the cancer industry.
Science shows that the untreated live longer
After 25 years of researching the life of patients suffering from cancer, Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a professor of Medical Physics and Physiology at Berkeley, California, presented shocking results through an American Cancer Society Seminar in 1969.
The results of his study showed that patients who are treated with chemotherapy and other conventional treatments (like radiation, and surgery) do not live longer than the ones who are not. He even asserted that in many cases they live longer.
His paperwork named “Demographic Consideration of the Cancer Problem” was published in Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (Series II, Vol. 18, pp. 298-333).
The discovery about the rate of survival of women suffering from breast cancer who rejected the conventional treatments, such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery was particularly disturbing. Namely, the results showed that women who didn’t undergo any treatment lived four times longer than women who were treated with some of the conventional treatments.
“People who refused treatments lived for an average of 12 and a half years. Those who accepted other kinds of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years”, stated Dr. Hardin B. Jones.
There are also other researchers who confirm the same conclusions. After a study conducted at the Harvard School of Public Health, the biologist Dr. Maurice Fox from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded the following: “Those who refused medical procedures had a lower mortality rate than those who submitted”.
Also, Dr. Maurice`s article about the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on February the 2nd, 1979 showed many things such as:
- The death rate and the diagnosis of breast cancer was twice as frequent in 1975 than in 1935, which means that in this period nothing was done in order for it to be cured.
- Total mastectomy was nothing better than simple lump removal.
- Early diagnosis led to faster treatment and earlier death.
- Patients who rejected medical treatments had lower mortality rate than those who accepted the conventional treatments.
In 1978, Dr. Michael Feldman and his team conducted a study at the Weizmann Institute in Israel.
On March the 15th, 1980, the British medical journal The Lancet published an article named “Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer,” which said:
“Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis. Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy…. Actuarial survival analysis … reveals no prolongation in overall survival, despite the increased use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The survival of the 78 patients who received chemotherapy from first detection of metastases (including single-agent chemotherapy) was no better than that of the 80 who did not receive chemotherapy. There was also no improvement in survival for those who received multiple-drug chemotherapy (66 patients)…. The fact that regressions of breast cancer had no influence on overall survival must reflect the inadequacy of present-day chemotherapy.”
How Lethal Is Chemotherapy?
The liquid of chemotherapy can burn right through human flesh, which shows how lethal it is. Here is what it actually did when applied on patient`s hand:
The image on the left presents the burning and scarring caused from chemotherapy fluid spilled on a bare hand.
It clearly shows how toxic and damaging the chemotherapy is. The picture is definitely worth more than 1000 words. Having on mind the fact that the outer human`s skin is better protected than the insides, you can image what the fluid does when injected venously in the patient.
Another thing which shows the harmfulness of this chemical, is the fact that the nurses have to wear personal protective equipment when treating patients with it.
Spills larger than 5 cc. require:
- The affected area mush be marked with warning signs, and the access must me blocked off.
- Picking up broken glass using the scoop in the “Chemotherapy spill kit”.
- Phone calls to the Occupational & Environmental Safety Office (OESO) and to 911.
- Two pairs of gloves (a rubber pair on the top, and latex pair for underneath the coveralls), and protective coveralls as well.
- Nurses are instructed to immediately go to the emergency room if during the procedure the chemotherapy drug comes in contact with their eye or their skin, or if they inhale airborne particles.
- Washing the spill area 3 times: with hydrogen peroxide, and twice with a strong detergent.
Unless you reject being treated with the conventional methods offered by your doctor and choose to treat the cancer yourself, the moment you are diagnosed with cancer, you become worth $300,000 to the cancer industry. After reading the consequences of the medicine method, you can decide for yourself if you will undergo those terribly damaging poisons, or you will treat your cancer effectively, safely, and cheaply, with the ingredients offered by nature without any negative effects.